Methodological Grounding

HOME

Updated: 2025-05-16 13:45 PDT

This appendix outlines the underlying philosophy, assumptions, and guiding principles that shape the approach of this study.

Purpose Before Proof

This project begins with a clear research question: Can Bitcoin mining remain viable after the block subsidy is gone? Rather than assume an answer, I will state my hypothesis:

Hypothesis:

"As Bitcoin's block subsidy approaches zero over time, transaction fees will increase proportionally to meet or exceed the operating costs of mining, maintaining network security through continued miner participation."

The Role of Assumptions

Some parameters in this study are not predictions, but design constraints:

• The subsidy will decline: This is hardcoded in Bitcoin's issuance schedule.
• Block space is limited: Demand will compete over a fixed supply.
• Mining is costly: Energy consumption and hardware expenses are unavoidable inputs.

Where assumptions are necessary (e.g., mining efficiency), they are explicitly separated from observations.

Data, Not Dogma

The goal of this research is not to evangelize or alarm, but to measure. I seek to:

• Track miner income over time (fees + subsidy)
• Observe how that income relates to difficulty
• Frame difficulty as a proxy for network-wide cost and security
• Detect inflection points (e.g., halving events) and their consequences

I welcome results that falsify my hypothesis. My priority is to get to the truth.

Commitment to Transparency

To ensure the results are reproducible and the methods are inspectable:

The crawler source code is (or will be) published in a separate page.

Data columns and smoothing techniques are documented in each appendix

Anomalies and gaps are flagged for manual review

Graphs are derived from raw CSV output with minimal human intervention

Epistemic Humility

• This study will never predict price.
• This study will not model human behavior.
• This study will not pretend the future can be known.

But it *will* document the historical relationship between reward and difficulty, and it *will* highlight where stress points emerge. That record may guide better questions in the future.

Why This Matters

Bitcoin is not static. It evolves through usage, through software, and through miner economics. By grounding this study in **data**, **clarity**, and **discipline**, we hope to contribute to the broader understanding of Bitcoin's long-term security model.

Even if the hypothesis fails, the methodology must hold.